January 26, 2018

November 30, 2017

Please reload

Recent Posts

Transparantie wordt overschat. RTL Z podcast interview (Dutch)

April 19, 2018

Please reload

Featured Posts

The Killer Rule

January 26, 2018

In my last blog I talked about how alignment can help you with the dilemma of both the necessity and the fallibility of rules and procedures. Every conscious leader constantly wrestles with how to give freedom to their employees so that they can do what they deem good for the organisation on the one hand while running a tight ship on the other that is as efficient as possible, wasting minimal resources and time. For the latter objective a clear set of rules and procedures is helpful and necessary, but they will certainly regularly interfere with the former.


Rules cannot cover all eventualities


Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), understood very well that a manual full of rules can start to lead its own life and that the rules cannot cover all eventualities. Having been pressed by others for a long time he eventually wrote the Constitutions, but stated in the introduction that the rules would never have absolute value; man always comes first. In a situation where the better, more humane solution appears to be contrary to the Constitutions, the more humane solution must always be chosen. In my opinion this is how all rule books should start: ‘Here are the rules of the game, but at all times keep in mind what it is really about and that this may mean you act against the rules and rightly so’. There is no game without rules, nor is there a game without healthy interpretation of the rules. 


When I discussed this with a leader of a big organisation undergoing serious change, he liked it a lot and has added exactly this rule to the new set of rules they had just defined. 


“If a situation warrants an action which you deem necessary, but goes against the rules we have defined: Go ahead and act, but do inform us afterwards.”


Isn’t that great? Looks like you have the best of both worlds. Of course, it might not turn out beneficially, but following the rules doesn’t offer any guarantees either. The important thing is that as a group, you’ll be more flexible to adapt to (unforeseen) circumstances and to learn and improve when discussing why you deviated from the rules.


Adapting and improving, that’s what it is about if you wish to survive and thrive as an individual, species or organisation.


How can we ensure that the different individuals with different competencies and insights collaborate towards a shared objective that would not be reached alone and adapt continuously to changing environments? This views the organisation as a living organism. That’s definitely closer to the truth than the old machine metaphor where all the cogs have to be synchronised. I believe it is a living organism, just different to what we are used to.

Let’s discuss that in the next blog.




Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Follow Us
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

We’d love to hear from you.

For general inquiries or to become a stockist mail to leapnow@thefearlessmonkey.com.

Sign up for Monkey News!

        Thank you for visiting the website and for your interest in The Fearless Monkey. It’s been quite a journey! Throughout the journey I have checked where I am.  Am I just following or am I thinking for myself? I have followed often, only to realise I am not going in the right direction and need to start thinking for myself again.  
I live what I write about, so I am often a monkey and sometimes a king. It is very exciting to share this with you.



         'Think For Yourself. And Do What Matters.'